Avast vs zonealarm security suites install#
Avast vs zonealarm security suites full#
Avast vs zonealarm security suites software#
Avast vs zonealarm security suites Pc#
Avast vs zonealarm security suites series#

Avast vs zonealarm security suites install#

In addition, the testers visit hundreds of websites, and install and launch dozens of popular tools.

Avast vs zonealarm security suites Pc#

This is indeed why the lab runs 1.4 million clean files through each test PC and has them checked out by the security software. That is why in the usability test, the laboratory evaluates how securely the applications can tell the difference between friend and foe.

Avast vs zonealarm security suites software#

It really is annoying when a security system suddenly quarantines a harmless software tool, blocking or even deleting it. For this, the packages only received 4 to 5 points. Only the programs from Check Point and Malwarebytes as well as AhnLab and with Total AV slowed down the PC more than the rest of the field. They are the products from Avast, AVG, Avira, BullGuard, Comodo, G Data, Microsoft as well as Trend Micro.

These are the packages from Bitdefender, F-Secure, K7 Computing, Kaspersky, McAfee, Microworld, PC Matic, Symantec and VIPRE Security.ĭue to the slightly measurable sacrifices in speed, the lab awarded what was still a good score of 5.5 points to 8 additional packages.

Avast vs zonealarm security suites full#

The findings are sure to be of interest to many users: 9 out of the 21 security tools had hardly any measurable slowing-down effect on the test PCs, thus receiving the full 6 points.

Afterwards, the procedure is repeated with each installed system watchdog and the results are compared. The time is clocked on these machines to see how long it takes to load a large number of websites, download tools, install and launch software, as well as to copy files. As part of the test, a normal PC and a high-end PC are used as reference devices. That's why, in the category of performance and in many application steps, the lab tests whether the PC is slowed down by a security package. If security slows down the PC during work or gaming, many users will then try to get rid of the software. All of the previously-mentioned packages, however, received the full 6 points for protection. This was followed by the packages from Avira, BullGuard, Check Point ZoneAlarm, F-Secure, K7 Computing, McAfee and VIPRE Security, with varying minor errors in detection in the individual test phases. With minor errors in the real-world test and a 99.5 percent detection rate, the packages from Avast, AVG, Bitdefender and PC Matic came in just behind the frontrunners. In all test phases, 5 products were able to detect the malware samples 100 percent of the time: They come from Comodo, Kaspersky, Microsoft, Symantec and Trend Micro. In the second phase, the object is actually to detect old known threats, as the malware samples in the reference set are up to 2 weeks old. Over a period of two months, the lab tests each security program in two phases: The real-world test involves the detection of entirely new malware samples that the lab has collected from websites and extracted from e-mails shortly prior to the test launch. The first question of users is always: How well does the security program detect attackers? AV-TEST providers answers to this question in a comprehensive protection test. The security packages from Avast, AVG, Avira, Bitdefender, F-Secure, Microsoft, Trend Micro and VIPRE Security followed with 17.5 points and TOP PRODUCT recognition. TOP PRODUCT recognition with 18 points was earned by the security suites from Kaspersky, McAfee and Symantec. Only 5 out of the 21 products tested came in below 16 points. An additional 5 products completed the test with good 17 to 16 points. In this test, the lab awarded this recognition to 11 out of 21 packages. If a candidate achieves 17.5 or even the maximum 18 points, then in addition to its certification, it also receives recognition as a TOP PRODUCT. In the test, each package has the opportunity to garner 6 points each in the three test phases of protection, performance and usability. This test also shows that users will find reliable security partners in these packages. The quality and reliability of the security packages has continually increased over the last few years. 11 out of 21 security packages with top scores

Avast vs zonealarm security suites series#

The test series naturally also includes Windows Defender, which Microsoft delivers embedded in its system. The laboratory of AV-TEST tested 21 current security suites and packages in terms of their protection, performance and usability. Good security software considerably lowers the risk of becoming the victim of an attack. Everything brings in money, which is anyone not paying attention will be hit. In their quest to make a quick buck, cyber gangsters are not discriminating as to whether private individuals or companies should pay for a ransom for their hijacked data.